Skip to main content

Bad & Badder--When "Ever Straights" Run the Program

Having spent loads of time in various "ex-gay" programs, the majority of the time I sat under the care of former gays--formerly practicing homosexuals.

Although lots of gay activist types may not like to hear it, these folks were wonderful to me--witty, compassionate, intelligent and sincere. When I hurt, they comforted me, and they ministered to me out of a heart of love.

But I also met another sort of "ex-gay" leader, the Ever Straight. These folks have never ever (no never) engaged in gay sex. Often married, with a history of drug, alcohol or sex addiction, or the product of a divorce where one parent was gay, they hope to straighten us gays out.

The difference between the former gays and the ever straights is as palpable as a cup of warm cocoa to a bucket of ice water. The ever straights exude a hardness and maintain a calculated clinical relationship with clients; I never felt safe around them.

Now I'm not suggesting that anyone should subject themselves to "ex-gay" programs, regardless the staff. I spent years of misery and confusion because I put myself in these places. I'm just saying that there are degrees of badness.

It's like when people thought President George H Bush (the daddy) was bad, that was of course until George W (the son) came along. Suddenly daddy seemed kind and gentle.

Perhaps the best way to dissuade queers from attending "ex-gay" programs is to fully staff them with ever straights. (Lord knows, most of the former gays fall off the wagon anyway.) Once queers feel the direct blow of hetero oppression, the plan will become clear. Ever straights don't want to save our souls, they want to recreate us in their own image, then turn us into oppressors (in Jesus name).

Former gays, once victimized by the system in turn victimize others. Ever straights bully queers and should be avoided at all costs.
Even former gays know this.

Comments

Anonymous said…
So, what you're saying is, it could be worse?

"Although lots of gay activist types may not like to hear it, these folks were wonderful to me--witty, compassionate, intelligent and sincere. When I hurt, they comforted me, and they ministered to me out of a heart of love."

That may be the first thing I've read on the subject that has actually calmed me down a bit. Thanks. I feel... quiet now.

That's something, at least. I'd begun to fear Smid was a moneygrabbing cynic. Somehow it doesn't seem as bad to think he's sincere in his misguidedness.

Bad and badder. Hmm... must think on this. I think your plan of getting only everstraights into running these places may work.

Except of course for the people made to stay there by their parents...
memphisman, that is it exactly! Give me Richard Simmons any day as my diet coach!
Anonymous said…
"Ever straights don't want to save our souls, they want to recreate us in their own image, then turn us into oppressors (in Jesus name)."

I wouldn't be so sure that THAT pathology is entirely correct. I think that "ever straights" are more into PUNISHING Queers out of a hateful fear or sense of violation/abandonment that they experienced from their relationships with a Queer spouse or parent etc. Of course they diguise that vindictivness as "Caring help" or "compassion".

But my attitude is "A pig is a pig, and thats that". Just like so-called "Hate crime laws" I don't really CARE what their inner thoughts and problems or intent are, what I am concerned about is their actual behavior.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Richard Simmons AND Van Dammit wouldn't be interested in getting people healthy if there wasn't a paycheck in it. The bottom-line is that they are both "entertainers" who are praying on, and profiting from peoples negative self-images and low self-esteem.

Getting *ANYONE* to help run these places is just not good thinking.

-Bob C

Popular posts from this blog

My Gay Husband--A Spouse Speaks Out

The other day I received the following e-mail from Susanne, a woman who found out her some years ago that her husband has same-sex attractions. I felt so moved by her words that I asked her permission to share them with you on the blog. I (recently) saw your Doin Time... and I was the one who asked about your wife during the discussion period that followed. I just read your thoughts on What About the Spouse ....and I can say, most women who find out their husbands are gay feel ALL of those things you wondered about....some in more degrees than others... When my husband was dragged out of the closet because of his irreverent, immoral, and amoral behavior that our, then, 14 and 16 year old sons had to find on our home computer, I went into the closet. I didn't know what to pray for.... Do I pray that this will go away? Do I pray that he could go back to the way things were in our family before we knew about him,? Do I pray that I could go back to the way things were? After all ,...

The False Image of LIA

John Smid and me-Graduation 1998 (above) & John Smid today (left) By now many have heard that Tennessee's Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities determined that the "ex-gay" program, Love in Action, is operating two “unlicensed mental health supportive living facilities”. LIA has until Friday, September 23 to respond. If LIA statements in Eartha Jane Melzer's article are indicative to how the "change" program might respond, we may see LIA change right before our eyes from a clinical mental health compound into a house of praise and worship. Gerard Wellman, business administrator for Love in Action, and a former Love in Action client, said Sept. 13 that the organization has been in contact with the state but would not comment further. “As a church, we operate under a different set of rules,” Wellman said. Curious, and what rules might these be? What is even more curious is that according to LIA's site only one staff member ...

Puzzled

Last night I performed Transfigurations-Transgressing Gender in the Bible at Imago Dei Metropolitan Community Church in Glen Mills, PA (about 15 miles outside of Philly). I had a diverse audience of about 45 people -- college students, Quakers, straight, bi, trans and lesbian, young and old. I took my time with the piece maintaining a gentle meditative pace. For the ending when I reveal the identity of the narrator, I had instructed the light tech to dim the lights. Then as the closing music swelled, I asked her to raise the lights to their brigthest intensity. With the music playing, I exited. Always (up until last night) at this point the audience applauds, I wait 5 seconds then come out to take a bow. Last night I exited and then nothing. No one clapped. They sat quietly as the music played. I stood back stage puzzled, baffled. Now what do I do? Wait? Go out anyway? And I wondered for a moment, Did they hate it? Did I confuse them? Offend them? Bore them into a coma? After what ...