Skip to main content

LIA Sues TN: The Victim Strikes Back?

No surprise, Love in Action called on the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), a Christian legal defense organization, to help with the "ex-gay" programs current troubles with the state. Instead of admiting they might be doing something inappropriate, they've taken the victim role and are now suing the State of Tennessee.
This is harassment, pure and simple," said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Nate Kellum. "There is no legitimate state interest here. There's no health or safety violation, and there's no fire code or overcrowding concern. Love in Action's ministry has nothing to do whatsoever with mental health as defined by law, but the Department of Mental Health wants to regulate it anyway."
I remember when in LIA we talked about the victim roles we often took as gay men. We were encouraged instead to take responsibilities for our actions, even when others wronged us. Christians often feel under fire by the world and as a result, often overlook the areas in which they have hurt others.

Using the victim role helps to garner sympathy, and in this case LIA wants to paint itself as little David with the big Goliath, in the form of the state of Tennessee, harrassing and taunting the Christian non-profit. Armed with legal aid from the ADF as well as the support and connections from the two largest Southern Baptist churches in Tennessee, LIA is not a weak little victim fighting for its life. This is the time for LIA to look at itself honestly and really question what it does and if it really provides the help its leaders promise.

Queer Action Coaltion has the full story and links. LIA also published a statement on their site.

Comments

Guano said…
I kind of welcome this lawsuit.

If the state decides to make them back up their claims in a court of law, they'll have to provide some sort of proof.

So lets see those medical studies touting the effectiveness of LIA.

Expert witnesses? Bring em on.

Former clients, haul em into court baby!

Lets get this show on the road and see exactly what LIA is really made of.

(I also posted this comment at QAC)
Anonymous said…
Will the trial be televised?
Anonymous said…
Leave it to John Smid to be the victim now. He already has so many FI's. It seems to be that now he now trying to manipulate the situation for his gain. None of these things surprise me. During the three years I spent at LIA, he "challenged" me on all these points. So is LIA trying to make people straight? It seems to have had the opposite effect on John. They do practice "therapeutic" principles. I have several e-mails and documentation to prove it. And now they don't want to answer to the authority of others? I can’t even think straight now it makes me so angry. I hope the state will continue to try and shut them down. He and LIA are very dangerous to those who are in the program. They take your money and when you are no longer of any use to them they want nothing more to do with you. I hope LIA gets everything it deserves.
Anonymous said…
Federal trials are not televised.
The Revolution Will Not be Televised but it will be blogged.

Scott, you make an excellent point (I wanna give you positive credit--sorry a little LIA in joke that Scott and I share with the other LIA survivors).

Should this go before a court, then the burden of proof is not only on the state of TN but on LIA. The "logic" that the ADF uses in its statements sounds dodgy at best (but so is the way of many legal arguments).

The state definition of mental illness is clear and exists for a good reason. This is not about "ex-gay" ministry or any kind of Chrisitan ministry. It is about the responsibility of the state to protect the welfare of mentally ill patients, a population that gravitates towards LIA.

The ADF's claim that LIA operates a facility similar to a homeless shelter would be laughable if it wasn't so sinister. Besides, what homeless shelter charges over $1500 per month in exchange for marching particpants through a 12-step prorgrams, group counseling and psychological harrassment?
Willie Hewes said…
This is rediculous. From my blog:

Think of it this way: these methods, group sharing, councelling, journalling,
are all developed to interfere with the way the mind works. They are applied when the mind works in a destructive, unhealthy, negative way, by people who have the training and qualifications needed to apply them properly.

Love in Action applies them to something that is not an illness, thinking, and getting their clients to think, that it is. It's the equivalent of a minister with a set of scalpels and rubber gloves saying, "although liberal medical science denies it, we know the appendix is a tool of the devil and leads these people astay. It is our duty to help these people, because we are the only ones who will do what needs to be done!"

Then the state health authority knocks on the door and says: "er, excuse me, are you operating on people here? We do think you need a licence for that, and some training, perhaps?"

And the minister answers: "No, no, we don't need a licence! You see, these people aren't sick as the state defines sick! So we don't need a licence for what we do. Now stop harrassing us."
Anonymous said…
Are you guys (Scott, Peterson, Bob - and also Jeff Harwood) trying to get in contact with anyone from the State to help with the lawsuit/investigation? I certainly hope so. You guys have invaluable first-hand knowledge/documentation of the situation there....

Thank you for speaking out!
Bob P, I like the idea of your eye on that document. Between you and Scott I think you can organize the State's defense! Seriously, thanks for taking a look at it.

I think we will need to talk to the state about some of the abuses we have seen at LIA as we began to discuss in this blog entry and the subsequent comments. Annika is right; these stories need to be told.
Anonymous said…
" I feel suspicious that someone is reading Peterson's excellent blog (Petey, did I mention I need a favor?) and, should I share everything I think and know, that those with an opposing view might use the comments to build a defense."

Bob, I completely understand this. I myself have been questioning some of the things I've written about my journey and my process - knowing how much they (RR, ex-gay movement, etc) like to pick and select a sentence here or there and twist the meaning...we see that in how FOTF, CWA, AgapePress, etc, takes published and public studies and twists the outcomes or the findings and presents it as fact...

So I think you are not unduly paranoid. On the other hand, we have to speak our truth and not live in fear. It's hard to balance those two...but I don't think it should make us be silent.
Anonymous said…
I want to add, though, with regard to what all you know about LIA (details, specifics, etc), perhaps wait until you can get in contact with the State about the case...

But regarding your own story, or what you think about LIA, I think you should still feel free to write what you want.

Just my opinion. Don't know if it is right or wrong! :)

-Annika
Anonymous said…
I want to add, though, with regard to what all you know about LIA (details, specifics, etc), perhaps wait until you can get in contact with the State about the case...

But regarding your own story, or what you think about LIA, I think you should still feel free to write what you want.

Just my opinion. Don't know if it is right or wrong! :)

Popular posts from this blog

My Gay Husband--A Spouse Speaks Out

The other day I received the following e-mail from Susanne, a woman who found out her some years ago that her husband has same-sex attractions. I felt so moved by her words that I asked her permission to share them with you on the blog. I (recently) saw your Doin Time... and I was the one who asked about your wife during the discussion period that followed. I just read your thoughts on What About the Spouse ....and I can say, most women who find out their husbands are gay feel ALL of those things you wondered about....some in more degrees than others... When my husband was dragged out of the closet because of his irreverent, immoral, and amoral behavior that our, then, 14 and 16 year old sons had to find on our home computer, I went into the closet. I didn't know what to pray for.... Do I pray that this will go away? Do I pray that he could go back to the way things were in our family before we knew about him,? Do I pray that I could go back to the way things were? After all ,...

The False Image of LIA

John Smid and me-Graduation 1998 (above) & John Smid today (left) By now many have heard that Tennessee's Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities determined that the "ex-gay" program, Love in Action, is operating two “unlicensed mental health supportive living facilities”. LIA has until Friday, September 23 to respond. If LIA statements in Eartha Jane Melzer's article are indicative to how the "change" program might respond, we may see LIA change right before our eyes from a clinical mental health compound into a house of praise and worship. Gerard Wellman, business administrator for Love in Action, and a former Love in Action client, said Sept. 13 that the organization has been in contact with the state but would not comment further. “As a church, we operate under a different set of rules,” Wellman said. Curious, and what rules might these be? What is even more curious is that according to LIA's site only one staff member ...

Puzzled

Last night I performed Transfigurations-Transgressing Gender in the Bible at Imago Dei Metropolitan Community Church in Glen Mills, PA (about 15 miles outside of Philly). I had a diverse audience of about 45 people -- college students, Quakers, straight, bi, trans and lesbian, young and old. I took my time with the piece maintaining a gentle meditative pace. For the ending when I reveal the identity of the narrator, I had instructed the light tech to dim the lights. Then as the closing music swelled, I asked her to raise the lights to their brigthest intensity. With the music playing, I exited. Always (up until last night) at this point the audience applauds, I wait 5 seconds then come out to take a bow. Last night I exited and then nothing. No one clapped. They sat quietly as the music played. I stood back stage puzzled, baffled. Now what do I do? Wait? Go out anyway? And I wondered for a moment, Did they hate it? Did I confuse them? Offend them? Bore them into a coma? After what ...