Skip to main content

Big Changes

Well, many of you know that I recently announced that in February 2008 I will retire my play, Doin' Time in the Homo No Mo Halfway House--How I Survived the Ex-Gay Movement! I am still working out the gala finish to the play (and yes I am working on a DVD version of it although I want everyone to see it live).

I have experienced other changes too. My time at New England Yearly Meeting (an annual gathering of Quakers from New England) moved me deeply, particularly in my commitment to living a simply. I may even cancel one of my three cell phones!

The Testimony of Simplicity (via wikipedia)
The Testimony of Simplicity is the Quaker belief that a person ought to live his or her life simply in order to focus on what is most important and ignore or play down what is least important. It is the practice among Quakers (members of the Religious Society of Friends) of being more concerned with one’s inner condition than one’s outward appearance and with other people more than oneself. Friends believe that a person’s spiritual life and character are more important than the quantity of goods he possesses or his monetary worth. Friends also believe that one should use one’s resources, including money and time, deliberately in ways that are most likely to make life truly better for oneself and others.
Some ways I have incorporated the Testimony of Simplicity in my life include how I spend my money and time. Over the last few years I have tried to buy at least half of my clothing from charity shops like the Salvation Army. This not only saves money, but it also moves me away from the direct support of unfair labor practices for people in the clothing industry.

Part of the reason for being a vegan has to do with simplicity. A simple vegetable-based diet is cheaper and has less of an impact on the planet (and wonderfully healthy for most people). Lately I have been shopping for locally grown produce when possible. Some of you know that I have toyed with a raw vegan diet--delightfully simple, but not always practical when one travels a lot.

With travel I have made various changes and considerations, the biggest being when I got rid of my car in the summer of 2005. This has saved me money, helps the planet, connects me with my community and simplifies my life. When I have had a car, it was so easy to spend lots of time driving around doing unnecessary chores and shopping.

When I can, I walk. If I can't walk, I take the bus. If I can't take the bus, I try to share a ride with a friend or borrow a car. If I can't borrow a car, I rent a car. If the distance is too far, I take the train. If the distance is too far for the train, I fly.

I adore the Internet, but I am also addicted to it. I do not have an Internet connection at home other than through my Treo 700P phone (which I will most likely dump soon). When I had the Internet at home, I spent far too much time on-line and got very little done for the time spent typing away. Keeping my house quiet and restful (some say boring), helps me live a simpler life. I haven't had a TV for years. Don't get me wrong I LOVE TV and watch it whenever I travel, but I want to keep my home TV-free.

Also, two years ago I downsized from a one-bedroom to a studio apartment. Not only is it cheaper but cozier. My rent is dirt cheap and includes utility, so it is something I don't have to worry about. Having a small space is easier to clean and forces me to think about what I really need and don't need. It feels yummy to give things away.

Diet, clothing, travel, home. I never thought I could simplify these things, but as I do, I find that I have more freedom, not less. Having less monthly expenses free me up to do more with less. Eating a simple diet keeps me healthy. Having a quiet simple home centers me and takes off lots of stress.

Recently I instituted a HUGE change. I do not know what initiated it, but suddenly out of blue I created a massive shift in my lifestyle. Of course it is one of those changes most people can't see outwardly (the best changes are often that way). But this change affects my every move I make and one that I can sense every waking hour.

Yes, after four decades I have transitioned my undergarments from briefs to boxers (without the interim step of those clinging boxer-briefs that ride up your legs).

Who says you can't teach an old dog new tricks?

Comments

Abby said…
You're an inspiration, Peterson. You KNOW what an internet junkie I am. I need to downsize my complex lifestyle. I'm with you on the produce thing. So great.

Although that last change - DRASTIC!!
Christine Bakke said…
My friend, I must warn you about the slippery slope you are on.

What next, commando?
As a former commando (okay, paratrooper, but close enough), I must urge you not to go there. I'll beg if I must. If you insist, Christine and I may stage an intervention.
Liadan said…
As a female person, I must say I prefer my girl-boxers because they're well-nigh wedgie-proof. Viva simplicity.
Willie Hewes said…
Oh, what I wouldn't do for wedgie-proof underwear...

Anyway, thanks for the comment on my blog, I've not been blogging much, actually. I've been keeping up with your blog, but I can't get into the comments section anymore when I'm in work, so I can't comment on your posts unless I remember to go back in the evening.

Don't think I've abandoned you! Living simply is a worthwhile ideal. I'm tempted to say I wouldn't know where to start, but maybe I've already started. And being broke really helps you think about what you would really want to spend money on.

Anyway, congratulations on your achieved level of simplicity. May it continue to do you good. (Don't forget to blog though)
Elliot Coale said…
That's all so wonderful, Peterson. You are one of the healthiest people I know. :)

Now, about your dirt cheap rent... Talk to me about that, buddy. I might be in the market soon, and I'd really like to know more about that rent situation.
Liz Opp said…
Hey, Peterson.

It's always good for me to read how other Friends are living into the Testimonies from a deeper, spiritually grounded place and not just because "it's a good idea."

What concerns me as a Quaker about the Wikipedia entry, though, is that the excerpt you include in your post is more secular than faith-oriented. However, I see that the entry goes on to say:

Early Friends believed that it was important to avoid fanciness in dress, speech, and material possessions, because those things tend to distract one from waiting on God’s personal guidance. (emphasis mine)

Another take on the Testimony of Simplicity is from Northern Yearly Meeting":

"This testimony encourages Friends to consider obstacles in our lives which interfere with this Divine experience" (from the approved chapter in its Faith & Practice, still in process).

And, since each of us have our own personal and direct relationship to God, it makes sense that we each must discern what are obstacles to our path to God... and then what to do about it!

All that aside, even nonreligious people can reap the advantages--financial, healthwise, etc.--as you point to in your post.

Blessings,
Liz Opp, The Good Raised Up
Anonymous said…
You are so bad...'sensing the change'. That deserves an internet thwap...THWAP.

I think I know the reason though, it's called..getting old...haha.

Or it could be that you are (ahem) getting brave and if I have to explain what I mean then you really are getting old.

In any case, the gay code of style indicates that a gay man's boxers must pass the style test. Translated, there better be some patterns or colors on them boxers. Don't let us down bro. :-D

Hey, don't give me that look I'm not the one discussing my underwear choices on the internet! (laughing) And in the same post with profound religious thoughts. What madness is this? 0:-)

Hey, you know I luv ya...and yes I do understand your twisted sense of humor. :-)

And so does Christine...love that gal.
pw, thanks for the THWAP. Now I truly feel loved. Profound Religious Thoughts and Undergarments--this is your one-stop shopping for the profound to the profane.

Liz, thanks for deepening the testimony for us and bringing out the roots.

Christien, commando? that is far too simple for me (and from what I hear downright dangerous!) Ally, no intervention needed. :-)

willie, here is hoping for wedgie-proof knickers! Who is giving you wedgies anyway????

Elliot, I am the QUEEN of cheap rent. We should talk!

abby, you ARE an internet junkie. I learn more about the web from a 2 minute visit to your site than I do from any of those inane tech mags out there.
Michelle Galo said…
Thanks for the thoughts, Peterson. Your examples of simplicity are practical and inspiring. I've been working toward simplicity as well in terms of what I buy, what I support with the money I spend, and such. I'm a former vegan, current omnivore, but appreciate good vegetarian food when it's available.

The only diffence is that I've been realizing recently that an energy-efficient vehicle might simplifiy my life considerably. I live in a rural town with no public transport--just getting to a bus station requires that I impose upon someone for a 50-mile ride.

Popular posts from this blog

My Gay Husband--A Spouse Speaks Out

The other day I received the following e-mail from Susanne, a woman who found out her some years ago that her husband has same-sex attractions. I felt so moved by her words that I asked her permission to share them with you on the blog. I (recently) saw your Doin Time... and I was the one who asked about your wife during the discussion period that followed. I just read your thoughts on What About the Spouse ....and I can say, most women who find out their husbands are gay feel ALL of those things you wondered about....some in more degrees than others... When my husband was dragged out of the closet because of his irreverent, immoral, and amoral behavior that our, then, 14 and 16 year old sons had to find on our home computer, I went into the closet. I didn't know what to pray for.... Do I pray that this will go away? Do I pray that he could go back to the way things were in our family before we knew about him,? Do I pray that I could go back to the way things were? After all ,...

The False Image of LIA

John Smid and me-Graduation 1998 (above) & John Smid today (left) By now many have heard that Tennessee's Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities determined that the "ex-gay" program, Love in Action, is operating two “unlicensed mental health supportive living facilities”. LIA has until Friday, September 23 to respond. If LIA statements in Eartha Jane Melzer's article are indicative to how the "change" program might respond, we may see LIA change right before our eyes from a clinical mental health compound into a house of praise and worship. Gerard Wellman, business administrator for Love in Action, and a former Love in Action client, said Sept. 13 that the organization has been in contact with the state but would not comment further. “As a church, we operate under a different set of rules,” Wellman said. Curious, and what rules might these be? What is even more curious is that according to LIA's site only one staff member ...

Puzzled

Last night I performed Transfigurations-Transgressing Gender in the Bible at Imago Dei Metropolitan Community Church in Glen Mills, PA (about 15 miles outside of Philly). I had a diverse audience of about 45 people -- college students, Quakers, straight, bi, trans and lesbian, young and old. I took my time with the piece maintaining a gentle meditative pace. For the ending when I reveal the identity of the narrator, I had instructed the light tech to dim the lights. Then as the closing music swelled, I asked her to raise the lights to their brigthest intensity. With the music playing, I exited. Always (up until last night) at this point the audience applauds, I wait 5 seconds then come out to take a bow. Last night I exited and then nothing. No one clapped. They sat quietly as the music played. I stood back stage puzzled, baffled. Now what do I do? Wait? Go out anyway? And I wondered for a moment, Did they hate it? Did I confuse them? Offend them? Bore them into a coma? After what ...