Skip to main content

Change Was NOT Possible--part 3 of 3

This is the third in a three part series.
Part One: What Was I After and Why?
Part Two: What Happens When Change is not Possible?

Part Three: Living on the Outside

After I exited LIA, I lived for a short time as an ex-gay apart from being in the program. I kept accountable, denying myself daily, being careful where I went and what I thought. I took up the struggle as my daily cross to bear, believing that God would give me the strength to bear it each day, one day at a time. It was pretty much everything I did for the past 17 years, but this time with more therapy and tools at my disposal.

During his talk at the recent Love Won Out Conference in Phoenix (hat tip to Jim Burroway) Alan Chambers spoke about denial.
I think you can expect a life of obedience. Matthew 16:24 talks about those who take up their cross and follow the Lord. They have to live a life of denial. And in the early days of when I started speaking and debating and doing all sorts of things related to the issue of homosexuality, and took my position with Exodus, people used to say, "Oh Alan, you're just in denial." I used to get so mad when they'd say, "You're just in denial. You're just denying who you're really are." And I'd say, "No I’m not. I'm not in denial. I'm not in denial." And then I came to the place where I realized, you know what? God calls us as Christians to a life of denial.

I love that today, I realize that I do live a life of denial. Not denial of who I used to be, not denial of who I could be today, but I deny what comes naturally to me.
I too denied what came natural to me. My same-sex desires existed in me from the earliest time. I tried casting them out, handing them over to God, therapizing them away, containing them and ultimately denying them and nailing them to the cross. I crucified myself with Christ and died daily. The problem was I was not dying to “sin”. No what I thought was sinful in my life, my same-sex desires, only grew stronger with a natural energy that I could not destroy. No but I did died daily, by inches, my personality and my well being suffered.

Then one day I woke up and surveyed my life. I took stock of the depression, the stress, the feelings of self-loathing, and the exhaustion. I considered Jesus’ promise when he declared
Come to me all who are weary and heavy laden and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you for my yoke is easy and my burden is light.
I stayed in bed feeling the weight of the burdens piled on top of me. That yoke was not easy and the burden was not light. It crushed the life out of me. The letter of the law kills but the Spirit gives life. No matter how much I trusted in the Spirit’s power, I had insisted that the Spirit enable me to follow the law of man and not the word of God, and the law was killing me.

Then I said to myself, “What are you doing? This is insane!” And at that moment I woke up as if out of a coma and for the first time in nearly two decades I understood that my pursuit to change and suppress my sexuality was unnecessary and unhealthy. Sure I experienced change, but not what I had hoped for. The ex-gay process transformed me into a joyless, uptight, frustrated drone of a man, growing more and more distant from God despite the many hours of daily prayer and Bible study.

In my journey I began to realize that I needed help with specific issues. I objectified people and their bodies as sexual objects. I had the tendency to be compulsive and addictive in my sexual life and not see sex as a means of loving and building a relationship but as a means to quench an unmet need. I also realized how much I wished to fit in and please the straight men around me and live in such a way as to gain their approval and acceptance. But none of these issues had to do with my natural orientation towards men. In fact, mine was a very human struggle that many more straight men face than do gay men.

But in demonizing all same-sex desire, branding it evil, demonic, unhealthy and abnormal, I sought to destroy it. First I tried to magically alter it into heterosexuality and when I understood the implausibility of such a miracle, I then tried to silence and suppress my desires looking to God to enable me to destroy myself.

I sought the wrong things. Instead of focusing on the simple message of Jesus—love your neighbor as yourself—I coveted my straight neighbor and tried to become just like him. In the end I hated myself. I felt ashamed of myself and as a result I acted shamefully.

I accepted that I could not rid myself of my same-sex desires. I grew to understand that my desires were not abnormal or wrong. I accepted and affirmed myself. I then began to see real change in my life—the ability to address the sexual compulsion, the moral will to stop objectifying people as mere sexual objects.

I also found a new honesty with God and others, a transparency that eluded me for years. Friends and family noticed the difference over the past eight years and remark how I am much more alive, solid and emotionally available than ever before.

Some suggest that since we never can actually change our sexuality that we should still strive to cage it in, silence it and nail it to the cross. For me I realize that such a life does come not from a following God but from following man.

Change from being gay to straight was NOT possible for me, neither was it necessary. Trying to NOT be gay didn't work either, even when I viewed it as my sacrifice to God. Pursuing to change and suppress my sexuality came at a great cost. Sure I learned some good lessons, but ultimately the process caused me more harm than good.

Comments

Your thoughts here formed a connection in my mind with the way I've often heard the life of celibacy referenced in Protestant Christian contexts. Celibacy receives high praise from Paul, who asserts in 1 Corinthians 7, "It is good for a man not to touch a woman." Undergirding this is example of Jesus; it seems abundantly clear to me that his mention of "eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven" in Matthew 19 is self-referential. Yet, whenever the topic comes up among Christian men (at least in my experience), the tendency is to seize upon Paul's allowances (i.e. "Because of immoralities" in 1 Cor 7:2, "If they do not have self-control" in v. 9, etc.) rather than his primary teaching. Admitting (often sheepishly) the power of sexual desires in their lives, they proclaim, "A life of celibacy is not for me. I don't have the strength for it." Interestingly, the example of Jesus gets completely ignored in these conversations. It amazes me how we (Protestants) have so privileged the heterocentric conception of family that the model provided by Jesus himself has been completely excluded from the picture. (I suppose Martin Luther's abolishing of the monastic orders and making monks and nuns marry bears some of the responsibility for this, but I digress.)

Anyway, it seems inconsistent to me to excuse heterosexuals from more than a summary consideration of celibacy because they feel they lack the strength for it, yet to demand it of LGBT people.

While I'm on the subject, it also seems unfair to expect me to do decent theology or hermeneutics at 4:30 in the morning. But here we are.

Give Marvin a hug for me, Peterson. He left me a very sweet voicemail the other day. I think you should go easier on him...he sounded a little stressed out. =)
ally, very cool. You make an important connection. The teaching is clear, "It is better to marry than to burn."

I mentioned this once on a TV program where I appeared alongside of Alan Chambers. The host looked perplexed,
"What do you mean by burn?" I said, you know burn with lust, sexual desire. Some fires are not meant to be contained.

Yes, some, very few, are called to a life of celibacy, but for most of us, this is unrealistic and even dangerous long term (witness the abuse scandals in the Catholic Church.)

Of course going the route and marrying a person of the opposite sex is not usually a useful solution as most of those marriages seem to fail, and often happen at the expense of another person's happiness and satisfaction.

It confuses me that some anti-gay rights leaders talk about the wild and crazy promiscuous life that they believe gay men lead, yet when we seek to validate our relationships and build stable homes, these same family values folks seek to undermine our success by creating and maintaining legal barriers to our unions.

Ally, so glad you commented at 4:30 am. See what you sparked? Nice.
Anonymous said…
Peterson, You have explained it so well. The ex-gay agenda, indeed that of many churches, is Law based and full of burden and crushing weight, causing us to strive on our own strength to shed that weight. They leave out the ministry of the Holy Spirit that is ours as a result of the victory that Christ won on the Cross of Calvary. Indeed, His yoke is easy and His burden is light. "It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery." Galatians 5:1 (NASB) Instead of walking in liberty, we walk around in bondage working for that freedom that is ours in Christ. We become human "doings" and not human "beings". Barry
Anonymous said…
I don't feel that the goal is to become straight. The goal is to live the Christian life in wholeness. I believe that some people are able to develope straight tendencies, but ultimately, this is not the message of "ex-gay" ministries. Living a life consistent with Christian teaching is the goal.
anonymous, the history of the ex-gay movement and the church has been one of change. They advertised, "I Questioned Homosexuality: Change is Possible" It is only recently that they have been more clearly publicly stating that change in orientation is not a realistic goal. They rarely say though what they are actually advocating is celibacy for most people with same-sex attractions.

Yes, living a life with Christian teachings is absolutely essential. That is what I finally was able to embrace. The problem was I wasn't following Christ's teachings about homosexuality, I was following man's anti-gay teachings in Biblical disguise.

I do not want to open up a discussion about what the Bible says and doesn't say about people with attractions for people of the same-sex. That ground has been covered before by other people in other places.

If you truly believe that the scriptures say that you should not engage in same-sex love, then by all means be faithful to how you see it. Similarly I need to be faithful to God and to what God has taught me in my journey. I have learned to question what the world says about same-sex love and consider how the church has taken on the ways of this world. (Romans 12:1,2)
KJ said…
Well said, Peterson. I also agree with your comments to the anonymous contributor. Peace to those who feel led to "ex-gay" ministries, regardless of what that means, as I have great confidence that the Spirit uses many routes to help us understand that ultimately we all must come to rest in the providence of God.

That, or course, does not mean that the claims of ex-gay ministries should not be challenged, and I think that greatest challenge is the openly-lived life of peace of the GLBT believer. There is not better way to send the message, "All out are in free!"
Anonymous said…
Peterson, thanks for posting this, I think it helps other people understand what gays and lesbians in conservative faiths put themselves through. I wish I could say that I found the light at the end of the tunnel when it comes to all this, a way to reconcile sexuality and faith but so far I have been unsuccessful. Like many, one of the casualties of this life experiment was my faith, not exactly what I had in mind when I started on this strange journey decades ago.
BentonQuest said…
Sorry if this is leading things off track...

PW, has your faith really become a casulaity or has it changed into a new form? I think we often equate questioning faith to losing faith because of pastors who are not comfortable with questions. Questions are not bad and God does not frown on questioners. Maybe casuality is the wrong word. Perhaps your faith is just in a chrysalis, waiting to emerge renewed and ready to fly?
Anonymous said…
Benton, you could be right, it is still a bit early in the story to make claims one way or another. Perhaps the best way to describe my situation is that several months back I passed a watershed moment and now I'm not sure my faith made it over the crest with the rest of me.
Alan said…
http://alan-mihai.blogspot.com/2007/08/8-exodus-international-vs-orthodox.html

I have analyzed Exodus' Mission Statement and Doctrinal statements and would like feedback.
God bless us all.
Alan

Popular posts from this blog

My Gay Husband--A Spouse Speaks Out

The other day I received the following e-mail from Susanne, a woman who found out her some years ago that her husband has same-sex attractions. I felt so moved by her words that I asked her permission to share them with you on the blog. I (recently) saw your Doin Time... and I was the one who asked about your wife during the discussion period that followed. I just read your thoughts on What About the Spouse ....and I can say, most women who find out their husbands are gay feel ALL of those things you wondered about....some in more degrees than others... When my husband was dragged out of the closet because of his irreverent, immoral, and amoral behavior that our, then, 14 and 16 year old sons had to find on our home computer, I went into the closet. I didn't know what to pray for.... Do I pray that this will go away? Do I pray that he could go back to the way things were in our family before we knew about him,? Do I pray that I could go back to the way things were? After all ,...

The False Image of LIA

John Smid and me-Graduation 1998 (above) & John Smid today (left) By now many have heard that Tennessee's Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities determined that the "ex-gay" program, Love in Action, is operating two “unlicensed mental health supportive living facilities”. LIA has until Friday, September 23 to respond. If LIA statements in Eartha Jane Melzer's article are indicative to how the "change" program might respond, we may see LIA change right before our eyes from a clinical mental health compound into a house of praise and worship. Gerard Wellman, business administrator for Love in Action, and a former Love in Action client, said Sept. 13 that the organization has been in contact with the state but would not comment further. “As a church, we operate under a different set of rules,” Wellman said. Curious, and what rules might these be? What is even more curious is that according to LIA's site only one staff member ...

Puzzled

Last night I performed Transfigurations-Transgressing Gender in the Bible at Imago Dei Metropolitan Community Church in Glen Mills, PA (about 15 miles outside of Philly). I had a diverse audience of about 45 people -- college students, Quakers, straight, bi, trans and lesbian, young and old. I took my time with the piece maintaining a gentle meditative pace. For the ending when I reveal the identity of the narrator, I had instructed the light tech to dim the lights. Then as the closing music swelled, I asked her to raise the lights to their brigthest intensity. With the music playing, I exited. Always (up until last night) at this point the audience applauds, I wait 5 seconds then come out to take a bow. Last night I exited and then nothing. No one clapped. They sat quietly as the music played. I stood back stage puzzled, baffled. Now what do I do? Wait? Go out anyway? And I wondered for a moment, Did they hate it? Did I confuse them? Offend them? Bore them into a coma? After what ...